Management of contacts
The World Health Organization defines a contact as a person who has experienced any one of the following exposures during the 2 days before and the 14 days after the onset of symptoms of a probable or confirmed case:
Face-to-face contact with a probable or confirmed case within 3 feet (1 meter) and for more than 15 minutes
Direct physical contact with a probable or confirmed case
Direct care for a patient with probable or confirmed COVID-19 without using recommended personal protective equipment
Other situations as indicated by local risk assessments.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines a close contact as someone who has been within 6 feet (2 meters) of an infected person for at least 15 minutes over a 24-hour period, beginning 2 days before symptom onset (or 2 days before testing in asymptomatic patients).
Consult local guidance as definitions of a contact may vary depending on local public health advice.
Contacts should remain in quarantine and monitor their health for up to 14 days from the last day of possible contact with the infected person.
In the UK, Public Health England recommends a 10-day quarantine (or self-isolation) period after a potential exposure (it was reduced from 14 days to 10 days on 14 December 2020).
The CDC has shortened the minimum quarantine time after a potential exposure from 14 days to 7-10 days. Quarantine can end after day 7 if the patient tests negative and no symptoms have been reported during the quarantine period. Quarantine can end after day 10 without testing and if no symptoms have been reported during the quarantine period. Additional criteria (e.g., symptom monitoring, mask wearing) should continue until day 14 in both cases.
Consult local guidance for recommended quarantine locations and timeframes as recommendations vary depending on local public health advice.
Screening of travelers
Exit and entry screening may be recommended in countries where borders are still open, particularly when repatriating nationals from affected areas. Travelers returning from affected areas should self-monitor for symptoms for 14 days and follow local protocols of the receiving country. Some countries may require travelers to enter mandatory quarantine in a designated location (e.g., a hotel). Travelers who develop symptoms are advised to contact their local healthcare provider, preferably by phone. One study of 566 repatriated Japanese nationals from Wuhan City found that symptom-based screening performed poorly and missed presymptomatic and asymptomatic cases. This highlights the need for testing and follow-up.
Drive-through screening centers
Drive-through screening centers have been set up in some countries for safer and more efficient screening. The testee does not leave their car throughout the entire process, which includes registration and questionnaire, exam, specimen collection, and instructions on what to do after. This method has the advantage of increased testing capacity and prevention of cross-infection between testees in the waiting space.
There is little scientific evidence to support temperature screening with thermal cameras or temperature screening products as a reliable method for the detection of COVID-19 or any other febrile illness, especially if used as the main method of testing.
Noncontact infrared thermometers generally have reasonable sensitivity and specificity for detecting fever; however, their performance varies in different settings. Environmental factors (e.g., absolute temperature, variation in temperature, relative humidity) play an important role in the accuracy of the result. False negatives may be seen in people wearing make-up on the target area or who are significantly perspiring. False positives may be seen in people who are pregnant, menstruating, or on hormone replacement therapy, or those who have recently consumed alcohol or hot beverages, or done strenuous physical activity. Also, fever is not present in asymptomatic or presymptomatic people, and may not be present in symptomatic people, which means infected individuals could be missed.
While the forehead is the most feasible site for scanning, it is thought to be more prone to physiologic and environmental variations, and the wrist may be a better option as it may give more stable measurements under different circumstances.
Noncontact infrared thermometers demonstrated variable accuracy levels across populations and had a low sensitivity for temperatures >99.5℉ (>37.5℃) in adults compared with temporal artery thermometers. Therefore, they may not be the most accurate device for the mass screening of fever during a pandemic.
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer