证据
本页包含特色内容的快照,内容强调了探讨关键临床问题的证据,包括不确定性领域。敬请参阅主要专题参考文献列表,了解支持该专题的所有信息源详情。
BMJ Best Practice 临床实践证据表单
该表单为针对聚焦上述重要临床问题的指南所报道分析(以系统综述为基础)内容进行的总结。
Confidence in the evidence is very low or low where GRADE has been performed and the intervention may be less effective or likely to be more harmful than the comparison for key outcomes. However, this is uncertain and new evidence could change this in the future.
人群: People with chronic cough and normal chest x-ray and physical examination
干预: Chest CT scan
比较: No chest CT scan
| 结局 | 效能(BMJ 评价)? | 证据可信度(GRADE)? |
|---|---|---|
Diagnostic yield | See note ᵃ | Very Low |
源指南所述建议 We suggest that clinicians do not routinely perform a chest CT scan in patients with chronic cough who have a normal chest radiograph and physical examination.
注意 ᵃ The content of this table is based on four observational studies. One prospective study found that the diagnostic yield of chest CT scan was 3/46 (6.5%) participants, while three retrospective studies produced the following results: 20/34 (58%) participants, 9/21 (43%) participants, and 21/59 (36%) participants. The guideline task force noted that the variation in the above results, regarding the diagnostic yield of CT scan, were unlikely to explain the cause of coughs or influence treatment. The guideline task force also noted that there is concern about the potential cancer risk from CT radiation exposure, particularly in children and women, which should be weighed against any diagnostic yields.
该证据表单关联以下章节:
内容使用需遵循免责声明