When viewing this topic in a different language, you may notice some differences in the way the content is structured, but it still reflects the latest evidence-based guidance.

Craniopharyngioma

Last reviewed: 9 Dec 2025
Last updated: 06 Jan 2026

Summary

Definition

History and exam

Key diagnostic factors

  • visual loss
  • macrocephaly and hydrocephalus
  • faltering growth
Full details

Other diagnostic factors

  • symptoms of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (amenorrhea, erectile dysfunction)
  • headache
  • symptoms of intracranial hypertension (nausea, vomiting, decreased sensorium, diplopia)
  • galactorrhea
  • optic atrophy
  • polyuria/polydipsia
Full details

Risk factors

  • age 5 to 14 years
  • age 50 to 70 years
Full details

Diagnostic tests

1st tests to order

  • ophthalmologic evaluation; computerized visual-field examination
  • MRI brain (contrast-enhanced)
  • CT brain (contrast-enhanced)
  • serum prolactin
  • serum insulin-like growth factor 1
  • growth hormone (GH) stimulation test
  • serum luteinizing hormone
  • serum follicle-stimulating hormone
  • morning serum testosterone
  • serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4)
  • morning serum cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)
  • serum electrolytes
  • urine and serum osmolality
  • plain x-rays for bone age
Full details

Tests to consider

  • adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test
  • tissue histology
Full details

Treatment algorithm

ACUTE

at initial treatment

ONGOING

post initial treatment

Contributors

Authors

Olabisi Sanusi, MD

Assistant Professor (Skull Base and Open cerebrovascular)

Departments of Neurosurgery, Otolaryngology

Director of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Co-director Skull base fellowship

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland

OR

Declarações

OS has given lectures related to Craniopharyngioma at the Congress of Neurological Surgeons meeting 2023, and will be giving another at the National Association of Skull Base Surgeons Meeting 2025.

Agradecimentos

Dr Olabisi Sanusi would like to gratefully acknowledge Dr Marc C. Chamberlain and Dr Daniel L. Silbergeld, the previous contributors to this topic.

Declarações

MCC and DLS declare that they have no competing interests.

Revisores

Edwin S. Kulubya Jr., MD, MBA

Neurosurgical Research Fellow

UC Davis Medical Center

Sacramento

CA

Declarações

EK declares that he has no competing interests.

Ramez Kirollos, MBChB, FRCS(Ed), FRCS(Eng), MD, FRCS(SN)

Consultant Neurosurgeon

Addenbrooke's Hospital

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Cambridge

UK

Declarações

RK declares that he has no competing interests.

Keyoumars Ashkan, BA, BSc, MB BCh, MRCP, FRCS, FRCPS, FRCS(SN), MD

Consultant Neurosurgeon and Lead of Neuro-Oncology

King's College Hospital

London

UK

Declarações

KA declares that he has no competing interests.

Créditos aos pareceristas

Os tópicos do BMJ Best Practice são constantemente atualizados, seguindo os desenvolvimentos das evidências e das diretrizes. Os pareceristas aqui listados revisaram o conteúdo pelo menos uma vez durante a história do tópico.

Declarações

As afiliações e declarações dos pareceristas referem--se ao momento da revisão.

Referências

Nossas equipes internas de editoria e de evidências trabalham em conjunto com colaboradores internacionais especializados e pares revisores para garantir que forneçamos acesso às informações o mais clinicamente relevantes possível.

Principais artigos

Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-51.Texto completo  Resumo

Karavitaki N, Cudlip S, Adams CB, et al. Craniopharyngiomas. Endocr Rev. 2006 Jun;27(4):371-97. Resumo

Gan HW, Morillon P, Albanese A, et al. National UK guidelines for the management of paediatric craniopharyngioma. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 Sep;11(9):694-706. Resumo

Hoffman LM, Jaimes C, Mankad K, et al. Response assessment in pediatric craniopharyngioma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) Working Group. Neuro Oncol. 2023 Feb 14;25(2):224-33.Texto completo  Resumo

Artigos de referência

Uma lista completa das fontes referenciadas neste tópico está disponível para os usuários com acesso total ao BMJ Best Practice.
  • Craniopharyngioma images
  • Diagnósticos diferenciais

    • Pituitary adenoma
    • Diaphragmatic meningioma
    • Chiasmatic epidermoid
    Mais Diagnósticos diferenciais
  • Diretrizes

    • Response assessment in pediatric craniopharyngioma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) Working Group
    • National UK guidelines for the management of paediatric craniopharyngioma
    Mais Diretrizes
  • padlock-lockedConectar-se ou assinar para acessar todo o BMJ Best Practice

O uso deste conteúdo está sujeito ao nosso aviso legal