Cauda equina syndrome

When viewing this topic in a different language, you may notice some differences in the way the content is structured, but it still reflects the latest evidence-based guidance.

Última revisão das evidências: 21 Apr 2026
Última atualização do tópico: 28 Apr 2026

Resumo

Definición

Anamnesis y examen

Principales factores de diagnóstico

  • bladder dysfunction
  • lower limb weakness
  • saddle paresthesia/anesthesia
  • bowel dysfunction
Todos los datos

Otros factores de diagnóstico

  • low back pain
  • sciatica
  • sexual dysfunction
Todos los datos

Factores de riesgo

  • lumbar disk herniation
  • spinal trauma
  • spinal surgery
  • spinal epidural abscess
  • use of anticoagulation therapy
  • spinal stenosis
  • spinal tumor
  • age under 50 years
Todos los datos

Pruebas diagnósticas

Primeras pruebas diagnósticas para solicitar

  • MRI lumbar spine without intravenous contrast
  • CT lumbar spine without intravenous contrast
Todos los datos

Pruebas diagnósticas que deben considerarse

  • CT myelography of the lumbar spine
  • urodynamic testing
  • digital rectal exam
Todos los datos

Algoritmo de tratamiento

Agudo

confirmed cauda equina syndrome

Colaboradores

Consejeros especializados

Kenneth F. Casey, MD, FACS

Clinical Associate Professor

Neurosurgery

Michigan State University

Clinical Associate Professor

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Wayne State University School of Medicine

Detroit, MI

Disclosures

KFC declares that he has no competing interests.

Peer reviewers

Kevin Barraclough, MA, FRCP, FRCGP, LLB

GP

Painswick Surgery

Painswick

Gloucester

UK

Disclosures

KB is an author of references cited in this topic. KB declares that he has no competing interests.

Louis Chang, MD

Assistant Professor of Neurological Surgery

Weill Cornell Medicine

New York, NY

Disclosures

LC declares that he has no competing interests.

Peer reviewer acknowledgements

BMJ Best Practice topics are updated on a rolling basis in line with developments in evidence and guidance. The peer reviewers listed here have reviewed the content at least once during the history of the topic.

Disclosures

Peer reviewer affiliations and disclosures pertain to the time of the review.

References

Our in-house evidence and editorial teams collaborate with international expert contributors and peer reviewers to ensure that we provide access to the most clinically relevant information possible.

Key articles

Todd NV, Dickson RA. Standards of care in cauda equina syndrome. Br J Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;30(5):518-22. Abstract

Finucane LM, Downie A, Mercer C, et al. International framework for red flags for potential serious spinal pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Jul;50(7):350-72.Full text  Abstract

Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging; Hutchins TA, Peckham M, Shah LM, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria® low back pain: 2021 update. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Nov;18(11s):S361-79.Full text  Abstract

Germon T, Ahuja S, Casey ATH, et al. British Association of Spine Surgeons standards of care for cauda equina syndrome. Spine J. 2015 Mar 2;15(3 suppl):S2-4. Abstract

Chau AM, Xu LL, Pelzer NR, et al. Timing of surgical intervention in cauda equina syndrome: a systematic critical review. World Neurosurg. 2014 Mar-Apr;81(3-4):640-50. Abstract

Epstein NE. Review/perspective: operations for cauda equina syndromes - "The sooner the better". 2022 Mar 25;13:100.Full text  Abstract

Reference articles

A full list of sources referenced in this topic is available to users with access to all of BMJ Best Practice.
  • Differentials

    • Spinal epidural abscess
    • Osteoporotic spinal compression fracture
    • Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC)
    More Differentials
  • Guidelines

    • Best practice guidelines: spine injury
    • ACR appropriateness criteria: low back pain
    More Guidelines
  • Patient information

    Spinal cord compression: what is it?

    Spinal cord compression: what are the treatment options?

    More Patient information
  • padlock-lockedLog in or subscribe to access all of BMJ Best Practice

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer