Breast cancer in situ

References

Key articles

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer risk reduction [internet publication].Full text

Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1194-220.Full text  Abstract

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication].Full text

Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 20;34(33):4040-6. [Reaffirmed 2019.]Full text  Abstract

Reference articles

1. Hieken TJ, Cheregi J, Farolan M, et al. Predicting relapse in ductal carcinoma in situ patients: an analysis of biologic markers with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg. 2007 Oct;194(4):504-6. Abstract

2. Cocquyt V, Van Belle S. Lobular carcinoma in situ and invasive lobular cancer of the breast. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;17(1):55-60. Abstract

3. Ginter PS, D'Alfonso TM. Current concepts in diagnosis, molecular features, and management of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast with a discussion of morphologic variants. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Dec;141(12):1668-78.Full text  Abstract

4. Leonard GD, Swain SM. Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jun 16;96(12):906-20.Full text  Abstract

5. Shekhar MP, Tait L, Pauley RJ, et al. Comedo-ductal carcinoma in situ: a paradoxical role for programmed cell death. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008 Nov;7(11):1774-82.Full text  Abstract

6. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49.Full text  Abstract

7. Portschy PR, Marmor S, Nzara R, et al. Trends in incidence and management of lobular carcinoma in situ: a population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(10):3240-6. Abstract

8. Camus MG, Joshi MG, Mackarem G, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast. Cancer. 1994 Aug 15;74(4):1289-93. Abstract

9. Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):170-8.Full text  Abstract

10. Li CI, Anderson BO, Daling JR, et al. Changing incidence of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002 Oct;75(3):259-68. Abstract

11. Dania V, Liu Y, Ademuyiwa F, et al. Associations of race and ethnicity with risk of developing invasive breast cancer after lobular carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Nov 14;21(1):120.Full text  Abstract

12. Zygogianni AG, Kyrgias G, Gennatas C, et al. Male breast carcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors and current therapeutic approaches. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(1):15-9. Abstract

13. San Miguel P, Sancho M, Enriquez JL, et al. Lobular carcinoma of the male breast associated with the use of cimetidine. Virchows Arch. 1997 Mar;430(3):261-3. Abstract

14. Olivotto I, Levine M; Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (summary of the 2001 update). CMAJ. 2001 Oct 2;165(7):912-3.Full text  Abstract

15. Lakhani SR. The transition from hyperplasia to invasive carcinoma of the breast. J Pathol. 1999 Feb;187(3):272-8. Abstract

16. van de Vijver MJ, Peterse JL, Mooi WJ, et al. Neu-protein overexpression in breast cancer. Association with comedo-type ductal carcinoma in situ and limited prognostic value in stage II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1988 Nov 10;319(19):1239-45. Abstract

17. Wren BG. The origin of breast cancer. Menopause. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):1060-8. Abstract

18. Wazir U, Wazir A, Wells C, et al. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: current evidence and a systemic review. Oncol Lett. 2016 Dec;12(6):4863-8.Full text  Abstract

19. Shamir ER, Chen YY, Chu T, et al. Pleomorphic and florid lobular carcinoma in situ variants of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 85 cases with and without invasive carcinoma from a single academic center. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019 Mar;43(3):399-408. Abstract

20. Claus EB, Stowe M, Carter D. Breast carcinoma in situ: risk factors and screening patterns. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Dec 5;93(23):1811-7.Full text  Abstract

21. White E, Lee CY, Kristal AR. Evaluation of the increase in breast cancer incidence in relation to mammography use. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Oct 3;82(19):1546-52. Abstract

22. Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2402-16.Full text  Abstract

23. Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Mar;62(3):676-89.Full text  Abstract

24. Birch JM, Blair V, Kelsey AM, et al. Cancer phenotype correlates with constitutional TP53 genotype in families with the Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Oncogene. 1998 Sep 3;17(9):1061-8. Abstract

25. Brownstein MH, Wolf M, Bikowski JB. Cowden's disease: a cutaneous marker of breast cancer. Cancer. 1978 Jun;41(6):2393-8. Abstract

26. Pharoah PD, Guilford P, Caldas C, et al; International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium. Incidence of gastric cancer and breast cancer in CDH1 (E-cadherin) mutation carriers from hereditary diffuse gastric cancer families. Gastroenterology. 2001 Dec;121(6):1348-53.Full text  Abstract

27. Boardman LA, Thibodeau SN, Schaid DJ, et al. Increased risk for cancer in patients with the Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Jun 1;128(11):896-9. Abstract

28. Vasen HF. Clinical diagnosis and management of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Nov 1;18(21 Suppl):81-92S. Abstract

29. US National Library of Medicine. STK11 gene. Mar 2020 [internet publication].Full text

30. Jackson AW, Muldal S, Ockey CH, et al. Carcinoma of male breast in association with the Klinefelter syndrome. Br Med J. 1965 Jan 23;1(5429):223-5.Full text  Abstract

31. Patel AV, Press MF, Meeske K, et al. Lifetime recreational exercise activity and risk of breast carcinoma in situ. Cancer. 2003 Nov 15;98(10):2161-9. Abstract

32. Trentham-Dietz A, Newcomb PA, Storer BE, et al. Risk factors for carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Jul;9(7):697-703.Full text  Abstract

33. Izatt L, Greenman J, Hodgson S, et al. Identification of germline missense mutations and rare allelic variants in the ATM gene in early-onset breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999 Dec;26(4):286-94. Abstract

34. FitzGerald MG, Bean JM, Hegde SR, et al. Heterozygous ATM mutations do not contribute to early onset of breast cancer. Nat Genet. 1997 Mar;15(3):307-10. Abstract

35. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer risk reduction [internet publication].Full text

36. Visvanathan K, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Use of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 10;31(23):2942-62.Full text  Abstract

37. Visvanathan K, Fabian CJ, Bantug E, et al. Use of endocrine therapy for breast cancer risk reduction: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 20;37(33):3152-65.Full text  Abstract

38. Owens DK, Davidson KW, et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Medication use to reduce risk of breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019 Sep 3;322(9):857-67.Full text  Abstract

39. Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WL, et al. Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jul 19;345(3):159-64.Full text  Abstract

40. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Dec 20;81(24):1879-86. Abstract

41. National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer risk assessment tool: about the calculator. Dec 2017 [internet publication].Full text

42. Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Towards an integrated model for breast cancer etiology: the lifelong interplay of genes, lifestyle, and hormones. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(5):213-8.Full text  Abstract

43. Chlebowski RT, Aragaki AK, Anderson GL, et al. Low-fat dietary pattern and breast cancer mortality in the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;35(25):2919-26. Abstract

44. Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, et al. Alcohol and breast cancer in women: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. JAMA. 1998 Feb 18;279(7):535-40. Abstract

45. Sinclair J, McCann M, Sheldon E, et al. The acceptability of addressing alcohol consumption as a modifiable risk factor for breast cancer: a mixed method study within breast screening services and symptomatic breast clinics. BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):e027371.Full text  Abstract

46. Cutuli B, Dilhuydy JM, De Lafontan B, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast: analysis of 31 cases. Eur J Cancer. 1997 Jan;33(1):35-8. Abstract

47. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis [internet publication].Full text

48. Monticciolo DL, Malak SF, Friedewald SM, et al. Breast cancer screening recommendations inclusive of all women at average risk: update from the ACR and Society of Breast Imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Sep;18(9):1280-8.Full text  Abstract

49. Weinstein SP, Slanetz PJ, Lewin AA, et al; Expert Panel on Breast Imaging. ACR appropriateness criteria® supplemental breast cancer screening based on breast density. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Nov;18(11s):S456-73.Full text  Abstract

50. Chen HL, Zhou JQ, Chen Q, et al. Comparison of the sensitivity of mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and combinations of these imaging modalities for the detection of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 2;100(26):e26531.Full text  Abstract

51. Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R, et al; American Cancer Society. Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1599-614.Full text  Abstract

52. Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1194-220.Full text  Abstract

53. Plana MN, Carreira C, Muriel A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2012 Jan;22(1):26-38. Abstract

54. Wright JL, Rahbar H, Obeng-Gyasi S, et al. Overcoming barriers in ductal carcinoma in situ management: from overtreatment to optimal treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 20;40(3):225-30.Full text  Abstract

55. Peters NH, van Esser S, van den Bosch MA, et al. Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET - randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2011 Apr;47(6):879-86. Abstract

56. Fancellu A, Turner RM, Dixon JM, et al. Meta-analysis of the effect of preoperative breast MRI on the surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ. Br J Surg. 2015 Jul;102(8):883-93.Full text  Abstract

57. van Bekkum S, Ter Braak BPM, Plaisier PW, et al. Preoperative breast MRI in management of patients with needle biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;46(10 pt a):1854-60. Abstract

58. Hussain M, Cunnick GH. Management of lobular carcinoma in-situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia of the breast: a review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr;37(4):279-89. Abstract

59. Bruening W, Fontanarosa J, Tipton K, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of core-needle and open surgical biopsy to diagnose breast lesions. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Feb 16;152(4):238-46. Abstract

60. Jiwa N, Gandhewar R, Chauhan H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of nipple aspirate fluid cytology in asymptomatic patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;28(7):3751-60.Full text  Abstract

61. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication].Full text

62. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and management. Recommendations 1.4: surgery to the axilla. Jul 2018 [internet publication].Full text

63. Allison KH, Hammond MEH, Dowsett M, et al. Estrogen and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 May;144(5):545-63.Full text  Abstract

64. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, and pancreatic [internet publication].Full text

65. Manahan ER, Kuerer HM, Sebastian M, et al. Consensus guidelines on genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer from the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3025-31.Full text  Abstract

66. Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019 Aug 20;322(7):652-65.Full text  Abstract

67. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice. ACOG committee opinion no. 727. Cascade testing: testing women for known hereditary genetic mutations associated with cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):e31-4.Full text  Abstract

68. Peila R, Arthur R, Rohan TE. Risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the UK Biobank cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;64:101648. Abstract

69. Franceschi D, Crowe J, Zollinger R, et al. Breast biopsy for calcifications in nonpalpable breast lesions. A prospective study. Arch Surg. 1990 Feb;125(2):170-3. Abstract

70. Silverstein MJ. The University of Southern California/Van Nuys prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am J Surg. 2003 Oct;186(4):337-43. Abstract

71. Claus EB. Risk models used to counsel women for breast and ovarian cancer: a guide for clinicians. Fam Cancer. 2001;1(3-4):197-206. Abstract

72. Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 4;(6):CD001877.Full text  Abstract

73. US Preventive Services Task Force. Final recommendation statement: breast cancer screening. Feb 2016 [internet publication].Full text

74. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Practice Bulletins - Gynecology. Practice bulletin no. 179: breast cancer risk assessment and screening in average-risk women. 2017; reaffirmed 2021 [internet publication].Full text

75. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Draft recommendation statement: breast cancer - screening​. May 2023 [internet publication].Full text

76. Aristokli N, Polycarpou I, Themistocleous SC, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), ultrasound and mammography for detection of breast cancer based on tumor type, breast density and patient's history: A review. Radiography (Lond). 2022 Aug;28(3):848-56. Abstract

77. Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA. 2004 Dec 8;292(22):2735-42.Full text  Abstract

78. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Mar-Apr;57(2):75-89.Full text  Abstract

79. Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA. 2012 Apr 4;307(13):1394-404.Full text  Abstract

80. Kerlikowske K, Sprague BL, Tosteson ANA, et al. Strategies to identify women at high risk of advanced breast cancer during routine screening for discussion of supplemental imaging. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1230-9.Full text  Abstract

81. Committee opinion no. 625: management of women with dense breasts diagnosed by mammography. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;125(3):750-1.Full text  Abstract

82. US Food and Drug Admisitration. ​Important information: final rule to amend the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA). Sep 2024 [internet publication].Full text  Abstract

83. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice advisory to committee opinion no. 625: management of women with dense breasts diagnosed by mammography. Apr 2023 [internet publication]Full text

84. Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, et al. Breast cancer screening for women at higher-than-average risk: updated recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Sep;20(9):902-14. Abstract

85. American Cancer Society. Recommendations for the early detection of breast cancer. Jan 2022 [internet publication].Full text

86. American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria: imaging after breast surgery. 2022 [internet publication].Full text

87. Brown A, Lourenco AP, Niell BL, et al; Expert Panel on Breast Imaging. ACR appropriateness criteria® transgender breast cancer screening. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Nov;18(11s):S502-15.Full text  Abstract

88. American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria: palpable breast masses. 2016 [internet publication].Full text

89. Narod SA, Iqbal J, Giannakeas V, et al. Breast cancer mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):888-96.Full text  Abstract

90. Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 20;34(33):4040-6. [Reaffirmed 2019.]Full text  Abstract

91. Shelley W, McCready D, Holloway C, et al; Cancer Care Ontario. Management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Jan 2018 [internet publication].Full text

92. Hughes LL, Wang M, Page DL, et al. Local excision alone without irradiation for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 10;27(32):5319-24.Full text  Abstract

93. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Groshen S, et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1999 May 13;340(19):1455-61.Full text  Abstract

94. Wapnir IL, Dignam JJ, Fisher B, et al. Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Mar 16;103(6):478-88.Full text  Abstract

95. McCormick B, Winter KA, Woodward W, et al. Randomized phase III trial evaluating radiation following surgical excision for good-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term report from NRG Oncology/RTOG 9804. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov 10;39(32):3574-82. Abstract

96. Solin LJ, Gray R, Baehner FL, et al. A multigene expression assay to predict local recurrence risk for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 May 15;105(10):701-10.Full text  Abstract

97. van Seijen M, Lips EH, Thompson AM, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: to treat or not to treat, that is the question. Br J Cancer. 2019 Aug;121(4):285-92.Full text  Abstract

98. McCormick B, Winter K, Hudis C, et al. RTOG 9804: a prospective randomized trial for good-risk ductal carcinoma in situ comparing radiotherapy with observation. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):709-15.Full text  Abstract

99. Stuart KE, Houssami N, Taylor R, et al. Long-term outcomes of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 10;15:890.Full text  Abstract

100. Correa C, McGale P, Taylor C, et al; Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Overview of the randomized trials of radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):162-77.Full text  Abstract

101. Giannakeas V, Sopik V, Narod SA. Association of radiotherapy with survival in women treated for ductal carcinoma in situ with lumpectomy or mastectomy. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181100.Full text  Abstract

102. Chua BH, Link EK, Kunkler IH, et al. Radiation doses and fractionation schedules in non-low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ in the breast (BIG 3-07/TROG 07.01): a randomised, factorial, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2022 Aug 6;400(10350):431-40. Abstract

103. Kirby AM. Updated ASTRO guidelines on accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI): to whom can we offer APBI outside a clinical trial? Br J Radiol. 2018 May;91(1085):20170565.Full text  Abstract

104. Fisher ER, Sass R, Fisher B, et al. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6). I. Intraductal carcinoma (DCIS). Cancer. 1986 Jan 15;57(2):197-208.Full text  Abstract

105. Kaufman SA, Harris EE, Bailey L, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria® ductal carcinoma in situ. Oncology (Williston Park). 2015 Jun;29(6):446-58, 460-1.Full text  Abstract

106. Fung E, Hendry J. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) techniques used in breast cancer treatment to reduce cardiac exposure. Radiography. 2013 Feb 1;19(1):73-8.Full text

107. Correa C, Harris EE, Leonardi MC, et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: executive summary for the update of an ASTRO evidence-based consensus statement. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Mar - Apr;7(2):73-9. Abstract

108. Hickey BE, Lehman M. Partial breast irradiation versus whole breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 30;(8):CD007077.Full text  Abstract

109. Xiang X, Ding Z, Feng L, et al. A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole-breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2021 Feb 2;16(1):24.Full text  Abstract

110. Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 14;368(11):987-98.Full text  Abstract

111. Sundara Rajan S, Verma R, Shaaban AM, et al. Palpable ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of radiological and histological features of a large series with 5-year follow-up. Clin Breast Cancer. 2013 Dec;13(6):486-91. Abstract

112. Godat LN, Horton JK, Shen P, et al. Recurrence after mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Am Surg. 2009 Jul;75(7):592-5; discussion 595-7. Abstract

113. Hwang ES. The impact of surgery on ductal carcinoma in situ outcomes: the use of mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):197-9.Full text  Abstract

114. Moran CJ, Kell MR, Flanagan FL, et al. Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ patients. Am J Surg. 2007 Aug;194(2):172-5. Abstract

115. Staley H, McCallum I, Bruce J. Postoperative tamoxifen for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;(10):CD007847.Full text  Abstract

116. Margolese RG, Cecchini RS, Julian TB, et al. Anastrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing lumpectomy plus radiotherapy (NSABP B-35): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet. 2016 Feb 27;387(10021):849-56.Full text  Abstract

117. Biganzoli L, Battisti NML, Wildiers H, et al. Updated recommendations regarding the management of older patients with breast cancer: a joint paper from the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) and the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):e327-40. Abstract

118. Petrelli F, Barni S. Tamoxifen added to radiotherapy and surgery for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a meta-analysis of 2 randomized trials. Radiother Oncol. 2011 Aug;100(2):195-9. Abstract

119. Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP). Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov;42(17):2909-13.Full text  Abstract

120. Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial: preventing breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010 Jun;3(6):696-706.Full text  Abstract

121. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE, et al. Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 23;364(25):2381-91.Full text  Abstract

122. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Forbes JF, et al. Anastrozole for prevention of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women (IBIS-II): an international, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 Mar 22;383(9922):1041-8.Full text  Abstract

123. Ligibel JA, Bohlke K, May AM, et al. Exercise, diet, and weight management during cancer treatment: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 1;40(22):2491-507.Full text  Abstract

124. Rock CL, Thomson CA, Sullivan KR, et al. American Cancer Society nutrition and physical activity guideline for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 May;72(3):230-62.Full text  Abstract

125. Khatcheressian JL, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 1;31(7):961-5.Full text  Abstract

126. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and management. Jun 2023 [internet publication].Full text

127. Visser LL, Groen EJ, van Leeuwen FE, et al. Predictors of an invasive breast cancer recurrence after DCIS: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 May;28(5):835-45.Full text  Abstract

128. Rowell NP. Are mastectomy resection margins of clinical relevance? A systematic review. Breast. 2010 Feb;19(1):14-22.Full text  Abstract

129. Rosso S, Gondos A, Zanetti R, et al; EUNICE Survival Working Group. Up-to-date estimates of breast cancer survival for the years 2000-2004 in 11 European countries: the role of screening and a comparison with data from the United States. Eur J Cancer. 2010 Dec;46(18):3351-7. Abstract

130. Pappo I, Wasserman I, Halevy A. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in men: a review. Clin Breast Cancer. 2005 Oct;6(4):310-4. Abstract

131. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Sep 16;90(18):1371-88. Abstract

132. Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J, et al; Adjuvant Tamoxifen: Longer Against Shorter (ATLAS) Collaborative Group. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet. 2013 Mar 9;381(9869):805-16.Full text  Abstract

133. Kelley BP, Valero V, Yi M, et al. Tamoxifen increases the risk of microvascular flap complications in patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb;129(2):305-14.Full text  Abstract

134. Khosrow-Khavar F, Filion KB, Bouganim N, et al. Aromatase inhibitors and the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in women with breast cancer: a population-based cohort study. Circulation. 2020 Feb 18;141(7):549-59.Full text  Abstract

135. Luo J, Cochrane BB, Wactawski-Wende J, et al. Effects of menopausal hormone therapy on ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Feb;137(3):915-25. Abstract

136. Martino S, Cauley JA, Barrett-Connor E, et al; CORE Investigators. Continuing outcomes relevant to Evista: breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal osteoporotic women in a randomized trial of raloxifene. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Dec 1;96(23):1751-61.Full text  Abstract

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer