The diagnostic approach to a patient with tachycardia focuses on rapid assessment of the clinical consequences and careful assessment to identify the mechanism of the arrhythmia and the setting in which it is occurring (drug toxicity, structural heart disease, ischaemia).

In the setting of haemodynamic instability, it is important that diagnostic manoeuvres do not delay therapy necessary to terminate the tachycardia.[1][2][35]


Often, patients with paroxysmal tachycardia will be asymptomatic at the time of assessment. Symptoms associated with tachycardia include palpitations, fatigue, lightheadedness, pre-syncope, chest discomfort, and dyspnoea.

Details of the pattern of the symptoms should be obtained, such as regular or irregular palpitations, number and frequency of episodes, potential triggers, whether the onset is abrupt or gradual, duration of symptoms, and how the tachycardia terminates.

The history should also include an assessment of potential stressors such as hypovolaemia, infection, ischaemia, heart failure; the patient's medication regimen (including herbal supplements); a thorough history of substance use or misuse (including caffeine, energy drinks, and other stimulants); and any family history of arrhythmias or sudden death.

Pre-syncope and syncope associated with tachyarrhythmia and structural heart disease have a poor prognosis and should prompt detailed questioning surrounding the event.

A history of gradual onset and termination is more common with sinus tachycardia and atrial tachycardia, whereas an abrupt onset and termination is more common for re-entrant tachycardias such as supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). The ability to terminate the rhythm abruptly with vagal manoeuvres suggests that the re-entrant rhythm circuit involves the AV node and is associated with AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) or orthodromic AV reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT).[34]

It is important to note that a common misconception is that haemodynamic stability may help to 'rule out' VT. However, VT may commonly be tolerated haemodynamically and, in contrast, some atrial arrhythmias (for example, atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter conducting with a rapid ventricular rate) may be poorly tolerated. Therefore, haemodynamic stability should not be a factor in distinguishing VT from atrial arrhythmias.

Physical examination

The standard physical examination is often unrevealing, particularly if the tachycardia is episodic and not ongoing at the time of assessment.

The physical examination should include a detailed cardiac examination to assess for valvular, congenital, and other structural heart disease.

A careful assessment for signs of cardiomyopathy should be performed because of the worse prognosis of tachyarrhythmias associated with structural heart disease. This includes looking for S3 gallop, right ventricular (RV) heave, laterally displaced point of maximal impulse, and other signs of heart failure (elevated jugular venous pressure, lower-extremity oedema).

If the patient has the symptoms at the time of physical assessment, determining whether the pulse is regular or irregular can greatly assist with a diagnosis. Physical examination findings associated with AV dissociation such as cannon A waves or variability in the intensity of S1 are highly suggestive of VT.[36]

Diagnostic studies: 12-lead ECG

The resting 12-lead ECG is the cornerstone of the standard assessment of tachycardia.

Even if the patient does not have the tachyarrhythmia at the time of the ECG, one can assess for evidence of prior myocardial infarction (pathological Q waves), prolonged QT interval, ischaemia, atrial or ventricular enlargement or hypertrophy, and signs of pre-excitation.

Evidence of pre-excitation, evidenced by a widened QRS complex with a delta wave, should raise suspicion for AVRT. The ECG should also be closely assessed to rule out artifacts such as electrical interference or movement of telemetry monitoring leads as a cause for the observed abnormality. com.bmj.content.model.assessment.Caption@c3b9df9[Figure caption and citation for the preceding image starts]: Artifact overlying sinus rhythmFrom the collection of Robert W. Rho, MD; used with permission [Citation ends].

If the patient is experiencing the tachyarrhythmia at the time of the ECG, the findings can be diagnostic.

Having determined whether the tachyarrhythmia has a narrow or wide QRS interval, one can apply the appropriate diagnostic algorithm to develop a preliminary differential or diagnosis.[1] If P waves cannot be seen, sometimes an oesophageal lead can also be used to help determine the atrial:ventricular relationship during tachycardia.[1][2]

During the assessment of a regular narrow-QRS-complex tachycardia (<120 ms), assessment of the response to elevated AV nodal blockade, either through carotid massage or with adenosine, can assist with the differential diagnosis. Intravenous adenosine should be administered in a monitored setting and with a continuous 12-lead ECG recording at the time of the manoeuvre. Absence of effect on ventricular rate, a temporarily gradual slowing of ventricular rate, or sudden termination of the tachycardia may be helpful in the diagnosis and can be therapeutic in some situations. Temporary AV block may unmask an atrial tachyarrhythmia. If this is ineffective or not feasible and the patient is haemodynamically stable, intravenous beta blocker or intravenous diltiazem or verapamil can be used.

For the assessment of wide-QRS-complex tachycardia (>120 ms), differentiation between SVT and VT is important because intravenous medications for SVT (verapamil or diltiazem) can have adverse and even fatal consequences in a patient with VT. If differentiation between SVT and VT cannot be made, one should suspect and treat as VT until shown otherwise, especially in a patient with structural heart disease.

A useful way to sub-categorise SVTs is to assess the relationship between the P wave and the preceding R wave. SVTs can be categorised into short-RP tachycardias (RP less than half the R-R interval) and long-RP tachycardias (RP greater than half the R-R interval). Short-RP tachycardia with retrograde P waves usually represents typical (slow-fast) AVNRT, AVRT, or atrial tachycardia with prolonged AV conduction. A long-RP tachycardia usually represents permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia, atypical (fast-slow) AVNRT, or an atrial tachycardia conducting with brisk AV node conduction.[1][2]

Further diagnostic studies

Monitoring devices

  • If the patient has frequent episodes (several per day) of the presumed tachyarrhythmia but is not experiencing the rhythm at the time of assessment, an ambulatory 24- or 48-hour Holter recording can be used.

  • If the episodes are less frequent and would be unlikely to occur during a 24- to 48-hour monitoring period, an event or wearable loop recorder can be used.[37][38]

  • If episodes occur rarely (<2 episodes per month) and are associated with haemodynamic instability or syncope (in which case activation of an event monitor is unlikely), an implantable loop recorder is appropriate and has been shown to be effective.[35]

  • If the patient already has a pacemaker or defibrillator in place, interrogation of the device may greatly assist with diagnosis.[39]


  • Imaging is not required in all cases and its use depends on the nature of the suspected tachyarrhythmia and the patient's overall clinical presentation.

  • Indications for echocardiography include wide-complex tachycardia of unknown origin, documented sustained atrial arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, SVT), or findings on history or physical examination that suggest structural heart disease.

Exercise testing

  • Exercise testing may be helpful in defining the association of the arrhythmia to exercise, in provoking the arrhythmia, and in ruling out significant coronary artery disease, if appropriate.

  • If the arrhythmia is provoked during the study, the onset, termination, and a full 12-lead ECG of the arrhythmia is provided.

  • The exercise stress test is particularly helpful in provoking VT in patients suspected to have right ventricular outflow tract VT.

Electrophysiology testing

  • A diagnostic electrophysiological study (EPS) is a useful tool for clarifying the mechanism of sustained and non-sustained supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. In wide-complex tachycardias where the diagnosis is uncertain, a diagnostic EPS can be helpful in establishing whether the arrhythmia is supraventricular or ventricular in origin. In addition to the diagnosis of tachyarrhythmias, several arrhythmias can be successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation at the time of the EPS.

  • Indications for referral to a cardiac arrhythmia specialist for EPS include, but are not limited to:

    • Unknown wide-complex tachycardias

    • Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (pre-excitation with arrhythmia)

    • History of MI with history or symptoms suggestive of VT.

Laboratory testing

  • Baseline laboratory assessment should be targeted toward the patient's overall clinical picture but should include:

    • Blood electrolytes, particularly potassium, magnesium, and calcium; additionally, hypovolaemia, which can manifest as pre-renal azotaemia or orthostatic hypotension, can cause sinus tachycardia

    • FBC, to determine if anaemia is a contributing factor

    • Thyroid function tests, which are often normal, though it is reasonable to do them, particularly if hyperthyroidism is in the differential diagnosis

    • Cardiac markers, which (for patients who present with chest pain, have significant risk factors for ischaemic heart disease, or are otherwise unstable) can show whether ischaemia or infarction are contributing factors

    • Drug levels, because drug toxicity should be considered, particularly for patients who are on digitalis or who present with closely associated rhythms such as bi-directional VT or atrial tachycardia with AV block

    • Toxicology screen, for stimulants such as cocaine or tricyclic antidepressants.

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer