Internationally, incidence rates of rhegmatogenous RD differ only slightly. These differences may be due to the age of the population surveyed and whether pseudophakic/aphakic patients were included in the study, rather than to a genetic predisposition. In the US, there are approximately 28,000 cases of rhegmatogenous RD each year. The mean annual age- and sex-adjusted incidence in one study was 17.9/100,000 population in Olmsted County,[2]Rowe JA, Erie JC, Baratz KH, et al. Retinal detachment in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976 through 1995. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:154-159.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9917797?tool=bestpractice.com
and in another study 12.9/100,000 population in Rochester, Minnesota.[3]Wilkes SR, Beard CM, Kurland LT, et al. The incidence of retinal detachment in Rochester, Minnesota, 1970-1978. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:670-673.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7148948?tool=bestpractice.com
The higher rate in Olmsted County may be attributable to the greater number of cataract procedures. A rate of 8.0/100,000 population has been reported in China;[4]Li X; Beijing Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Study Group. Incidence and epidemiological characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Beijing, China. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2413-2417.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14644727?tool=bestpractice.com
6.9/100,000 population in Finland;[5]Laatikainen L, Tolppanen EM, Harju H. Epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in a Finnish population. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1985;63:59-64.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3993347?tool=bestpractice.com
10.4/100,000 population in Sweden;[6]Törnquist R, Stenkula S, Törnquist P. Retinal detachment: a study of a population-based patient material in Sweden 1971-1981. I: epidemiology. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1987;65:213-222.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3604613?tool=bestpractice.com
and 10.4/100,000 population in Japan.[7]Sasaki K, Ideta H, Yonemoto J, et al. Epidemiologic characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Kumamoto, Japan. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995;233:772-776.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8626085?tool=bestpractice.com
The incidence of rhegmatogenous RD increases with age.[3]Wilkes SR, Beard CM, Kurland LT, et al. The incidence of retinal detachment in Rochester, Minnesota, 1970-1978. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:670-673.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7148948?tool=bestpractice.com
For patients 60 years and older, the rate increased to 21.8 /100,000 population in Finland[5]Laatikainen L, Tolppanen EM, Harju H. Epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in a Finnish population. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1985;63:59-64.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3993347?tool=bestpractice.com
and to 28.0 /100,000 population in Sweden.[6]Törnquist R, Stenkula S, Törnquist P. Retinal detachment: a study of a population-based patient material in Sweden 1971-1981. I: epidemiology. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1987;65:213-222.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3604613?tool=bestpractice.com
There have been conflicting reports about prevalence in men and women, although one study found men to be more affected than women.[8]Chou SC, Yang CH, Lee CH, et al. Characteristics of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Taiwan. Eye. 2007;21:1056-1061.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16691255?tool=bestpractice.com
BMJ Best Practice is an evidence-based point of care tool for healthcare practitioners.
To continue reading and access all of BMJ Best Practice's pages you'll need to log in or start a free trial.
You can access through your institution if your hospital, university, trust or other institution provides access to BMJ Best Practice through either OpenAthens or Shibboleth.