{"id":3117,"date":"2016-04-01T13:10:10","date_gmt":"2016-04-01T13:10:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bestpractice.bmj.com\/?p=3117"},"modified":"2017-11-10T16:03:47","modified_gmt":"2017-11-10T16:03:47","slug":"electronic-resources-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bestpractice.bmj.com\/info\/us\/electronic-resources-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Electronic resources review"},"content":{"rendered":"

Key findings<\/strong><\/p>
\r\nThis review is an evaluation of BMJ Best Practice. According to the author, \u201cBMJ Best Practice provides an easy to-use, evidence-based POC tool for clinicians and students. The flexibility of online as well as mobile device access adds to the value of the resource. The availability of BMJ Best Practice content via ePocrates for individual users expands the access to content for those clinicians who are not affiliated with an organization or institution subscription source.\u201d
\r\n
\r\nRead more<\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Key findings This review is an evaluation of BMJ Best Practice. According to the author, \u201cBMJ Best Practice provides an easy to-use, evidence-based POC tool for clinicians and students. The flexibility of online as well as mobile device access adds to the value of the resource. The availability of BMJ Best Practice content via ePocrates […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2723,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-studies-us"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t