{"id":3045,"date":"2017-03-30T13:24:19","date_gmt":"2017-03-30T12:24:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bestpractice.bmj.com\/?page_id=3045"},"modified":"2026-01-20T16:33:33","modified_gmt":"2026-01-20T15:33:33","slug":"critical-appraisal-checklists","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/bestpractice.bmj.com\/info\/us\/evidence\/ebm-toolbox\/critical-appraisal-checklists\/","title":{"rendered":"Critical appraisal checklists"},"content":{"rendered":"

There are numerous checklists available to act as memory aids for evaluating studies and they can be very useful.<\/p>
\r\nThe SR toolbox<\/a> is a website providing regularly updated lists of the available guidance and software for each stage of the systematic review process, including screening and quality assessment.
\r\n
\r\nCritical appraisal is much more than a ‘tick box’ exercise. It is needed to evaluate the weight we can put on the findings, and how far we can generalize the results from trials into routine practice to inform clinical care.
\r\n
\r\nSince these pragmatic issues always need to be borne in mind when critically appraising study data, here we present some examples of checklists for different study types and some information for tricky critical appraisal scenarios.
\r\n
\r\nAppraising two-armed RCTs<\/a>
\r\nAppraising multiple-armed RCTs<\/a>
\r\nAppraising diagnostic test studies<\/a>
\r\nAppraising systematic reviews<\/a>
\r\nAssessing multiple systematic reviews on the same question<\/a>
\r\n
\r\nContent created by BMJ Knowledge Centre<\/strong><\/em>
\r\n
\r\nRead more<\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There are numerous checklists available to act as memory aids for evaluating studies and they can be very useful. The SR toolbox is a website providing regularly updated lists of the available guidance and software for each stage of the systematic review process, including screening and quality assessment. Critical appraisal is much more than a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":3043,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"marketing_new.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3045","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":{"components":[{"choose_component":"generic","hide":"","logged_in":["yes"],"logged_out":"","grey_background":"","background_color":"","background_image":null,"title_text_color":"","title":"Critical appraisal checklists","text":"

There are numerous checklists available to act as memory aids for evaluating studies and they can be very useful.<\/h1>\r\nThe SR toolbox<\/a> is a website providing regularly updated lists of the available guidance and software for each stage of the systematic review process, including screening and quality assessment.\r\n\r\nCritical appraisal is much more than a 'tick box' exercise. It is needed to evaluate the weight we can put on the findings, and how far we can generalize the results from trials into routine practice to inform clinical care.\r\n\r\nSince these pragmatic issues always need to be borne in mind when critically appraising study data, here we present some examples of checklists for different study types and some information for tricky critical appraisal scenarios.\r\n