Uma introdução aos conceitos da MBE: uma bibliografia dos principais recursos

PORQUÊ EBM?

• Kiessling A, Lewitt M, Henriksson P, et al. Case-based training of evidence-based clinical practice in primary care and decreased mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. Ann Fam Med 2011;9:211–218. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21555748
• Shuval K, Linn S, Brevis M, et al. Association between primary care physicians' evidence-based medicine knowledge and quality of care. Int J Qual Health Care 2010;22:16–23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19951965
• Barratt A. Evidence based medicine and shared decision making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Paciente Educ Couns 2008; 73:407 —412. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18845414
• Lockwood D, Armstrong M, Grant A. Integrating evidence based medicine into routine clinical practice: seven years' experience at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London. BMJ 2004;329:1020–1023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15514349
• Lucas BP, Evans AT, Reilly BM, et al. The impact of evidence on physicians' inpatient treatment decisions. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:402–409. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15109337

O QUE É A EBM?

• Greenhalgh T. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ 2014;348:g3725 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24927763
• Glasziou P, What is EBM? Evidence-Based Medicine 2011;16:129-130. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21949274
• Dickersin K. Evidence based medicine: increasing, not dictating, choice. BMJ 2007;334:s10 https://www.bmj.com/content/334/suppl_1/s10
• Reilly BM. The essence of EBM. BMJ 2004;329;991–992. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15514321
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg W, Gray JA, et al. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996;312:71–72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8555924
• Evidence-based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992;268;2420–2425. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1404801

Sites

• The history of evidence based medicine - Oral History project from JAMA and The BMJ. Disponível a partir de https://www.bmj.com/campaign/ebm-history (acessado pela última vez em 8 de fevereiro de 2019)

PERGUNTA CLÍNICA, PESQUISA E SELEÇÃO DE ESTUDO

• Ioannidis, J. The need to consider the wider agenda in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: breadth, timing, and depth of the evidence. BMJ 2010;341:c4875 https://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c4875
• Glanville J, Bayliss S, Booth A, et al. So many filters, so little time: the development of a search filter appraisal checklist. J Med Libr Assoc 2008; 96(4):356–361. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2568852/
• O’Connor D, Green S, Higgins JPT (editores). Chapter 5: Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. Em: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Intervention Version 5.1.0 (atualizado em março de 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Disponível em www.handbook.cochrane.org
• Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. Em: Higgins JPT, Green S (editores). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (atualizado em março de 2011). A Colaboração Cochrane, 2011. Disponível em www.handbook.cochrane.org
• Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ (editores). Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. Em: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (atualizado em março de 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Disponível em www.handbook.cochrane.org.
• Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Wieland LS, et al. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? Systematic Reviews 2013;2:78. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24066664

Sites

• Centro para medicina baseada em evidências. Asking Focused Questions. Disponível a partir de https://www.cebm.net/asking-focused-questions/ (acessado pela última vez em 8 de fevereiro de 2019).
• Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Finding the Evidence 1 – Using PICO to formulate a search question. Disponível a partir de https://www.cebm.net/finding-the-evidence-1-using-pico-to-formulate-a-search-question/ (acessado pela última vez em 8 de fevereiro de 2019).
• The InterTASC Information Specialists' Sub-Group (ISSG) Search Filters Resource: Disponível em https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/ (acessado pela última vez em 8 de fevereiro de 2019).
• U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed Special Queries. Disponível em https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/special_queries.html (acessado pela última vez em 8 de fevereiro de 2019).

HABILIDADES DE AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA

• Sedgwick P. Bias in experimental study designs: randomised controlled trials with parallel groups. BMJ 2015;351. https://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h3869
• Windish D. Searching for the right evidence: how to answer your clinical questions using the 6S hierarchy. Evidence-Based Medicine 2013;18:93-97. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23048189
• Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (editores). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Em: Higgins JPT, Green S (editores). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (atualizado em março de 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Disponível em www.handbook.cochrane.org.
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 2008;336:995–998. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18456631
• Haynes RB. Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the "5S" evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions. Evid Based Med 2006;11:162–164. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17213159
• Barton S. Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? BMJ 2000;321(7256):255–256. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1118259/
• Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. Assessing the methodological quality of published papers. BMJ 1997;315:305–308. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9274555
• Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. Getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about). BMJ 1997;315:243–246. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9253275
• Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271:389-391. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/gim/_pdf/JAMA/3A-Diagnostic_Test.pdf
• Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271:703-707. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/gim/_pdf/JAMA/3B-Diagnostic_Test.pdf

Sites

• Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Critical Appraisal tools. Disponível a partir de https://www.cebm.net/2014/06/critical-appraisal/ (acessado pela última vez em 8 de fevereiro de 2019)
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP checklists. Disponível a partir de https://www.casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists (acessado pela última vez em 8 de fevereiro de 2019)
• Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. PRISMA Statement. Disponível em https://www.prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/Default.aspx (acessado pela última vez em 8 de fevereiro de 2019)
• Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Critical Appraisal: Notes and checklists. Disponível a partir de https://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/checklists.html

COMPREENDENDO A ESTATÍSTICA

• Sedgwick P. What is significance? BMJ 2015;350:h3475 https://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h3475
• Sedgwick P. What are the risks? BMJ 2015;350:h2931 https://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h2931
• Sedgwick P. Clinical significance versus statistical significance. BMJ 2014;348:g2130 https://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g2130
• Understanding statistical terms: 5. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Drug Ther Bull 2009;47:95–96. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19654420
• Understanding statistical terms: 4. Diagnostic tests. Drug Ther Bull 2009;47:71–72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19494344
• Understanding statistical terms: 3. Topics to do with study design. Drug Ther Bull 2009;47:59–60. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19423679
• Understanding statistical terms: 2. Drug Ther Bull 2009;47:35–36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19261839
• Understanding statistical terms: 1. Drug Ther Bull 2009;47:22–24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19193703
• Hatala R, Keitz S, Wyer P, et al. Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their results. CMAJ 2005;172:661–665. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738493
• Barratt A, WYer PC, Hatala R, et al. Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat. CMAJ 2004;171:353–358. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15313996
• Montori VM, Kleinbart J, Newman TB, et al. Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 2. Measures of precision (confidence intervals). CMAJ 2004;171:611–615. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15367466
• Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. Statistics for the non-statistician II: significant relationships and their pitfalls. BMJ 1997;315:422–425. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9277611
• Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. Statistics for the non-statistician I: different types of data need different statistical tests. BMJ 1997;315:364–366. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/927046

Sites

• BMJ Learning Understanding statistics 1: presenting data from clinical trials Um módulo interativo que descreve os conceitos básicos de diferentes formas de apresentação de dados estatísticos a partir de um ensaio clínico.
• BMJ Learning Understanding statistics 2: is there a significant difference? Um módulo interativo que usa exemplos práticos para trabalhar para ajudá-lo a aprender a interpretar os resultados de um ensaio, incluindo o significado estatístico.

COMPREENDENDO A METANÁLISE

• Perera R, Heneghan C. Interpreting meta-analysis in systematic reviews. Evid Based Med 2008;13:67–69. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18515615
• Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). BMJ 1997;315:672–675. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9310574

GRADE

• GRADE Series. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://www.jclinepi.com/content/jce-GRADE-Series

PRÁTICA BASEADA NA EVIDÊNCIA

• Walsh, K. Online clinical decision support: how it is used at the point-of-care. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning 2017; 0: 1-2 https://stel.bmj.com/content/early/2017/01/05/bmjstel-2016-000170.info
• McCartney M, Treadwell J, Maskrey N, et al. Making evidence based medicine work for individual patients. BMJ 2016; 353. https://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i2452
• Agoritsas T, Heen AF, Brandt L, et al. Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens. BMJ 2015;350. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25670178
• Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MPT, et al. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ 2012;344 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22286508
• Kitson A, Straus SE. The knowledge-to-action cycle: identifying the gaps. CMAJ 2010;182:E73–E77. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19948812
• Whitely R. Cultural competence, evidence-based medicine, and evidence-based practices. Psychiatr Serv 2007;58:1588–1590. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18048561
• Hasnain-Wynia R. Is evidence-based medicine patient-centered and is patient-centered care evidence-based? Health Serv Res 2006;41:1–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16479681
• Guyatt G, Cook D, Haynes B. Evidence based medicine has come a long way. BMJ 2004;329;990–991. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15514320
• Kotaska A. Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery. BMJ 2004;329:1039–1042. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15514356
• Lockwood S. "Evidence of me" in evidence based medicine? BMJ 2004;329;1033–1035. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15514354
• Slowther A, Ford S, Schofield T. Ethics of evidence based medicine in the primary care setting. J Med Ethics 2004;30:151–155. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15082808
• White B. Making evidence-based medicine doable in everyday practice. Fam Pract Manag 2004;11:51–58. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15011482
• Schattner A, Fletcher RH. Research evidence and the individual patient. QJM 2003;96:1–5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12509644
• Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. BMJ 1995;310:1122–1126. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7742682